|
|
|
| 2.1 |
Completing the Notification of Capital Asset Impairment Form (Exhibit D) |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1.1 |
Part A: Potential
Indicators of Impairments |
|
|
|
The first step in identifying potential
capital asset impairment, where the service utility of the asset has been significantly
impaired, is to determine if any of the following circumstances exist. Examples
have been provided for illustrative purposes: |
|
|
|
| |
|
1. |
Evidence
of physical damage |
|
|
Example - A building damaged by fire
or flood requiring restoration efforts to restore service utility. |
|
|
|
| 2. |
Changes in
legal or environmental factor that affect usage |
|
|
Example - The useful life of underground
storage tanks was significantly curtailed by the adoption of more stringent environmental
regulations. |
|
|
|
| 3. |
Technological
change or obsolescence |
|
|
Example - A scanning electron microscope
that is rarely used because newer equipment provides better service. |
|
|
|
| 4. |
Change in
the manner or expected duration of use |
|
|
|
Example - A building that the County
has decided to sell and is not being used. |
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
Construction
stoppage |
|
|
|
|
Example - A permanent stoppage of building
construction following the discovery of an endangered species at the construction
site. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1.2 |
Part B: Impairment Tests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The presence of one of the potential
indicators does not necessarily indicate that impairment has occurred. Two impairment
tests, both of which must be met, should be applied once a capital asset
has been identified as potentially impaired as described in Section 2.1.1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test 1 |
Is the magnitude of the decline in service
utility significant? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The guidance in GASB 42 is intended to
apply only to losses in service utility that are likely to be significant to the
County. If the cost to restore the asset to continue operation is significant in
relation to the service utility of the asset, this impairment test might be met. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test 2 |
Is the decline in service utility unexpected
or is it part of the normal life cycle of the capital asset? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management is not expected to foresee
with accuracy the useful life of a capital asset or the service utility throughout
its useful life. It is only natural that capital assets lose service capacity with
age and use. Such foreseeable changes are not evidence of capital asset impairment.
Additionally, sometimes the level of demand for a capital asset is significantly
less than anticipated. Such reduced demand should not, of itself, be treated as
a capital asset impairment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is the capital asset still in use? If
no, provide the date the asset was taken out of service. |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1.3 |
Part C: Temporary Impairments and Capital Assets That Do Not Meet Impairment Test |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generally, capital asset impairment should be considered permanent (e.g. physical
damage) and the asset"s value must be adjusted. However, in certain circumstances
(e.g., change in the manner or duration of use, technological changes, changes in
manner of use, or construction stoppage) evidence may be available to demonstrate
that the impairment will be temporary. In such circumstances, no impairment loss
would need to be recognized in the financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Is
the impairment temporary? If yes, give dates the asset was not in use. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The department must have sufficient evidence to prove the impairment is temporary.
For example, construction on an airport runway is stopped because of lack of funding.
However, funding from the State is expected to be approved in the future. In this
circumstance, there is evidence the impairment is temporary and no impairment loss
would be reported. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
An event or circumstance indicated possible impairment but the Impairment Tests
(detailed in Section 2.1.2) were not met. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Has the useful life of the asset changed because of the event or circumstance? If
yes, indicate new estimated useful life. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1.4 |
Part D: Insurance Recovery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impairment loss of a capital asset
must be reported on the financial statements net of any associated insurance recoveries. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Was any insurance
recovery received for the capital asset impairment? If yes, reference the transaction
or deposit order number and date. |
|
|
|
| 2.2 |
Measurement of Capital Asset Impairment |
|
|
Based on the information provided by
departments/agencies on the
Notification of Capital Asset
Impairments Form, the Auditor-Controller will make any calculations
necessary to measure the impairment and adjust the value of the asset to comply
with GASB 42 requirements. The following methods are used to measure the impairment
loss for capital assets that will continue to be used by the County. See
Exhibit B for a summary of the measurement methods. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2.1 |
Restoration Cost Approach |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The restoration cost approach is generally used to measure the estimated cost to
repair physical damage and restore the asset to its original condition so it can
continue to be used by the department. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2.2 |
Service Units Approach |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments that are caused by changes
in legal requirements, environmental factors, technological changes or obsolescence,
or change in the manner or duration of use generally will be measured using the
service units approach. This approach determines the amount of the impairment based
on the loss of productivity provide by the asset before and after the impairment
occurred. The cost of the loss of productivity is the impairment loss reported on
the financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2.3 |
Deflated Depreciated Replacement Cost Approach |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This approach is an alternative method that can be used when the impairment is caused
by a change in the manner or duration or use of the asset. This method calculates
what the depreciated cost of a replacement capital asset would be as a means to
determine the relative portion of the historical cost of the impaired capital asset.
This estimated current cost of the replacement asset is depreciated to reflect the
age of the impaired asset, and then deflated to convert it to historical cost dollars. |
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.3 |
Impaired Capital Assets No Longer in Use |
|
|
The value of an impaired capital asset that is no longer used by the County will
be adjusted by the Auditor-Controller to the lower of carrying value or fair market
value. |
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.4 |
Department or Agency Head Certification |
|
|
Each year after the June 30 records are complete, the Auditor-Controller will send to each department or agency director a certification form (Exhibit C) to sign certifying whether he/she is aware of any capital asset impairments in accordance with this procedure. The certification form will be submitted to the Auditor-Controller General Ledger Unit |
|
|
|
|
|